A Twitter Reaction
This morning’s twitter stream soon filled with the CIPD 2011 Social Media conference. I’d forgotten exactly what was on the agenda so I skipped over to the CIPD website for a look. Looking at the details, what I hadn’t appreciated was the price.... tickets were £550 for members or £600 for non-members.
This morning’s twitter stream soon filled with the CIPD 2011 Social Media conference. I’d forgotten exactly what was on the agenda so I skipped over to the CIPD website for a look. Looking at the details, what I hadn’t appreciated was the price.... tickets were £550 for members or £600 for non-members.
I’m a pretty tolerant soul and being typically Libran I’m
usually quite good at seeing both sides of an argument. However, the old amygdala kicked in big time
when I saw the price. Now to be clear, this is not a case of amygdala hijack! However, for some reason, this is making me
react...
Is this some reaction to the CIPD?
No – I’m not anti-CIPD. In fact their embracing of social media and
engagement with the community seems to be a positive thing.
Is this jealousy?
Do I wish I was there?
No – I already made the decision about what was most important and existing diary commitments won. I can catch up on what I missed through
social media and friends.
Is the scheduled agenda the issue?
No - I have no particular views on it but knowing who’s
involved I’m sure it will be excellent.
Deja Vu
The above don’t seem to hold any answers but my sense is that my reaction was in some way connected to recent blogs on conferences:
@onatrainagain
wrote here about the
prohibitive cost of conference attendance for certain sectors or those with
restricted financial circumstances.
@robjones_tring
wrote in quite a different vein about the conference experience here. In fact I think he was talking about
revolutionising the conference experience.
@neilmorrison
also wrote here
about conference attendance and value, remarking that something is going to
have to change...
What is really going on here?
Well I think possibly a few things but they centre about these observations...
- The cost of the conference today is prohibitive for some if not many. I understand the argument about affordability being our own judgement. However, in such times, when we price events at such levels we are effectively excluding people.
- In the past year I’ve attended conferences, unconferences, events and research days. The ones that have created the most value for me are those where there is content, challenge and community in abundance. Not exclusivity.
- There seems to be a correlation between community value and price paid. Where community engagement is high and is the driving force, the value is high and the cost is always low.
I value inclusivity and believe in the value of communities. My concern is that if we ignore the above we will find ourselves creating "cliqmunities"...
What next?
I’ve tried to be non-judgemental but please do react. Tell me what you think. Shape the thinking around this subject.
Talk about the impact of today’s conference in the context
of the above.
Talk about the value of the mainstream conference format.
Talk about how community can be brought together without
exclusion.
Perhaps more importantly, if you want to help provide
low-cost learning or mini-conferences for the broad HR community who can’t
afford mainstream prices. Then say
so. You won’t be alone.
Post Script
The title of this post was inspired by a tweet from @BillBoorman. I’d been struggling to describe and finish this blog and it just seemed to fit. Thanks Bill!